Skip to content

Public technical briefing from the MLNavigator Research Group.

← Back to Technical Briefings
complianceCMMCAS9100ITAR

Compliance Roadmap

January 29, 2026·MLNavigator Team

MLNavigator works where security, quality, and export-control obligations shape technical decisions early. adapterOS is for organizations that need local AI inside existing governance programs — not a program that replaces them.

Market alignment

The table below is target market alignment, not an assertion of audit readiness or completed control mapping. Formal compliance requires external assessment against a defined organizational boundary.

FrameworkStatusNotes
CMMCTarget market alignmentRelevant for controlled defense-adjacent deployments
AS9100Target market alignmentRelevant for documented quality processes
ITAROperating constraintInfluences local deployment choices

Public scope

Our public position is intentionally narrow. We design for environments where operations are documented, data movement is controlled, and change management is reviewable.

Formal compliance outcomes still depend on the organization’s scope, assessors, controls, and practice. Detailed control mappings, technical evidence design, and customer-specific implementation materials are not in this public note.

For how CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 apply when AI is air-gapped, see Offline AI Deployment Changes the Threat Model.

Define one workflow before deciding whether to evaluate it

Begin with a paid workflow-definition engagement under a scoped agreement. A controlled evaluation is a separate next step only after the workflow, source boundary, reviewers, prerequisites, and measures are agreed. This does not promise implementation, hardware, deployment, or a validated outcome.