Skip to content

Workflow definition comes first.

This compatibility route explains the current sequence: define one sensitive-document workflow under a scoped agreement, then decide whether a separately agreed controlled evaluation is appropriate. It does not establish implementation, hardware delivery, production deployment, or customer validation.

Overview

Workflow definition is for teams considering protected analytical work but not yet entitled to assume a product implementation exists for their environment. It names the candidate job, authority, source boundary, reviewers, measures, and unresolved prerequisites.

Commercial stages

1

Fit conversation

Before engagement

We compare the document job, decision owner, source boundary, and review needs without treating interest as implementation or product readiness.

Customer artifactCandidate workflow and open questions
2

Workflow definition

Scoped engagement

The parties define the candidate workflow, admitted sources, reviewer route, receiver event, measures, security constraints, and stop conditions.

Customer artifactWorkflow definition and acceptance plan
3

Prerequisite review

Before evaluation

The definition records environment, release, access, integration, privacy, and support dependencies that must be resolved before any evaluation can begin.

Customer artifactUnresolved prerequisite register
4

Evaluation decision

Separate agreement

A controlled evaluation is a separate decision. If both parties proceed, its exact build, environment, evidence, customer-owned measures, and acceptance boundaries are stated in its own agreement.

Customer artifactEvaluation plan or stop decision
5

Continuation decision

After evaluation only

Any continuation follows evidence from a completed controlled evaluation and remains separately scoped. Workflow definition alone proves no customer outcome.

Customer artifactExpand, revise, or stop record

What you provide

  • A candidate workflow and decision owner
  • The proposed source boundary
  • The review or compliance path
  • Proposed receiver and outcome measures
  • Known environment and facility constraints

What we provide

  • A bounded workflow-definition process
  • Source, reviewer, and receiver mapping
  • Security and data-boundary questions
  • Acceptance and stop-condition design
  • A separate evaluation decision point

What you receive

  • The written workflow definition
  • An admitted-source and authority map
  • A reviewer and receiver plan
  • An unresolved prerequisite register
  • An evaluate-or-stop decision packet

Pricing

Commercial engagements begin with paid workflow definition under a scoped agreement. Current canonical terms and any later controlled-evaluation terms are confirmed for the specific engagement rather than inferred from this compatibility URL.

Workflow definition does not include product implementation, production code, equipment, a production service level, or a promised evaluation outcome.

Tell us early about offline operation, restricted networks, regulated data, procurement, and review constraints so the definition can make unresolved prerequisites explicit.

Prove one workflow before expanding

During workflow definition, the parties state the evidence and customer-owned measures that would govern a controlled evaluation. Those criteria do not claim an evaluation has started or succeeded.

Usefulness

Named reviewers assess whether the result improves the real task, where it needs correction, and whether the workflow saves meaningful review effort.

Source support

Material claims must point back to the approved records the reviewer expects; unsupported or incomplete work stays visibly limited.

Operating boundary

A separately agreed evaluation would check local, network, retention, and diagnostic-export limits as product behavior rather than sales language.

Repeatability

The evaluation plan must state what configuration and review evidence the customer would receive to inspect and repeat agreed runs.

What workflow definition leaves behind

The definition packet makes the proposed work and its limits inspectable before either party decides whether to enter a controlled evaluation.

Definition packet

  • Candidate workflow, source boundary, and reviewer route
  • Receiver event and customer-owned measures
  • Security, privacy, and retention questions
  • Explicit exclusions and stop conditions

Prerequisite register

  • Required product release and environment evidence
  • Access, integration, and support dependencies
  • Conditions for a separately agreed evaluation
  • Decision to evaluate, revise the definition, or stop

FAQ

What runs locally during workflow definition?

Workflow definition is planning and specification. It does not itself install or operate adapterOS. Reviewed product behavior and current limitations live on adapteros.com.

What leaves the environment?

The definition records the proposed source boundary and excluded data. Any later evaluation must state its own handling and diagnostic-export rules before work begins.

What evidence is produced?

Workflow definition produces a scope, source and authority map, reviewer and receiver plan, measures, exclusions, and an unresolved-prerequisite register.

What would a controlled evaluation decide?

A separately agreed evaluation would measure the exact released build and agreed workflow against boundary safety, answer quality, review fit, and customer-owned outcome criteria.

Do you charge per token or per message?

No. Workflow definition and any controlled evaluation are scoped engagements. Current terms are confirmed in the governing agreement rather than inferred from message volume.

Which route should I use?

Use connect.adapteros.com for the adapterOS product briefing, workflow definition, and evaluation criteria. MLNavigator contact remains for company, funding, research, media, and relationship inquiries.

What budget or scope qualifies?

We confirm current terms during a fit conversation because the workflow, authority, source boundary, reviewers, receiver event, and unresolved prerequisites determine scope.

What is MLNavigator not selling?

Not a cloud chat subscription, model marketplace, product-readiness claim, or open-ended consulting program. The first commercial motion is paid workflow definition; controlled evaluation is separate.

What we are not selling

Not a claim that a customer environment or product implementation already exists.

Not free engineering or production code. Workflow definition is a bounded paid engagement.

Not a model marketplace or a promise that any particular model or environment is already approved.

Not an implied continuation. Evaluation and anything after it are separately scoped decisions.

Discuss workflow definition

We review the candidate workflow and inquiry scope before responding.

Start a fit conversationExplore adapterOS

See the evidence model →